الوزن - الدماغ - الزمن

إذا كان الجزء الثاني غير مترجم فسوف اقوم بذلك من That is, metrical variations are not significant in themselves, like sememes: but rather they form, together, a picture-like Gestalt which is a distinct representation of something that we can recognize; and thus, like pictorial representations, or music

وحتى
Footnotes
لذا أرجوا التأكيد لأبدأ في الترجمة

إذا كان الجزء الثاني غير مترجم فسوف اقوم بذلك من That is, metrical variations are not significant in themselves, like sememes: but rather they form, together, a picture-like Gestalt which is a distinct representation of something that we can recognize; and thus, like pictorial representations, or music

وحتى
Footnotes
لذا أرجوا التأكيد لأبدأ في الترجمة

==========
بارك الله فيك أختنا سماهر ، و جعل هذا العمل في ميزان حسناتك .

لقد وصل الاستاذ خشان في الترجمة إلى حدود الفقرة التالية :

The "message" that metrical variation conveys, however, is rather mysterious. If it is a code, what kind of code is it? Metrical scholars have attempted to discover exact relationships between individual metrical variations and the semantic content of poetry.17 But their conclusions have been disappointingly vague or arbitrary, reminiscent, in fact, of musicological attempts to assign fixed meanings to different musical keys, signatures, and variations, so as to make a symphony describe a scene or conduct an argument. Here the analogy between metrical and linguistic significance breaks down. certainly a connection between metrical (or musical) and linguistic meaning exists, and in some cultural traditions (English Augustan poetry and European Romantic music, for instance) artists have developed a self-conscious repertoire of metrical or musical codes to convey specific meanings

و الفقرة التي يليها و يمكنك البدء منها هي :

[justify] [/justify]

But other traditions do not possess such codifications, or else use the same
specific devices to convey entirely different ideas

The predicament of the critic, in fact, can be likened to that of a viewer of a
visual artifact who is so convinced that what he is looking at is a page of writing that he does not realize that the artifact is actually a picture. Perhaps it is a picture of something he had never seen (or never noticed), and thus his mistake is a natural one. But the attempt to extract a sort of linguistic meaning out of the planes, lines, corners, masses, and angles of a picture would be frustratingly arbitrary-especially if he had a whole series of paintings of different subjects, in which the same visual elements were used for entirely different purposes; the same curve for a face, a hillside, and the sail of a ship. Linguistic meaning and pictorial meaning are based on codes so fundamentally different that no code-cracking algorithm that would work on one could possibly work on the other. Their mutual intelligibility cannot be sought in the direction of analysis, but only within the context of a synthetic whole which contains both of them

شكرا لك .